skip to main | skip to sidebar
BLOG OF SCIENCE!

Science:

(n) the messy process by which basically irrational hyper-cephalic primates attempt to ask and answer questions about the world in a way that overcomes their own biases and foibles and simultaneously make a living, build a reputation and do the other things highly social primates need to do.


Showing posts with label fertility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fertility. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Article in The Scientist

http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/37154/title/Why-Women-Lose-Fertility/


Pers. Com. Dan Levitis at 01:57 3 comments:
Key Words demography, evolution, fertility, science journalism
Older Posts Home
View mobile version
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Dan Levitis, blogger of science

What is this "Blog of Science!" you speak of?

Blog of science isn't one of those science blogs about cool scientific results. It's about the experience of being a scientist doing science. It's about science the process, not science the outcome, or science the list of facts.

Backfile

  • ▼  2021 (3)
    • ▼  August (1)
      • 17 Months.
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2020 (3)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2019 (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2018 (1)
    • ►  September (1)
  • ►  2017 (9)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2016 (7)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
  • ►  2015 (8)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2014 (39)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2013 (8)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  February (2)
  • ►  2012 (46)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2011 (59)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (18)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (8)
  • ►  2010 (43)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2009 (115)
    • ►  December (10)
    • ►  November (12)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (12)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (17)
  • ►  2008 (108)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (14)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (15)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2007 (39)
    • ►  December (10)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (8)

Labels

  • science as process (127)
  • evolution (61)
  • demography (60)
  • me (52)
  • writing (51)
  • birds (45)
  • publishing (45)
  • current events (33)
  • teaching (33)
  • Behavior (27)
  • definitions (27)
  • rotifers (27)
  • grad school (26)
  • science photos (23)
  • Natural History (21)
  • primates (21)
  • EvoDemo (18)
  • politics (18)
  • Rostock (17)
  • career (17)
  • Climatology (16)
  • biases (16)
  • science journalism (16)
  • California (15)
  • El Cerrito Hillside Natural Area (15)
  • reproduction (15)
  • economics (13)
  • Grant applications (12)
  • biology (12)
  • health (12)
  • urban wildlife (12)
  • weather (12)
  • Berkeley (11)
  • global destruction (11)
  • hypotheses (11)
  • insects (11)
  • conferences (10)
  • ecology (10)
  • peer-review (10)
  • Germany (9)
  • cats (9)
  • data (9)
  • editor's note (8)
  • genetics (8)
  • humans (8)
  • language (8)
  • presentations (8)
  • reptiles (8)
  • sex (8)
  • technology (8)
  • Denmark (7)
  • animals (7)
  • education (7)
  • environment (7)
  • hydra (7)
  • senescence (7)
  • aging (6)
  • collaboration (6)
  • family (6)
  • food (6)
  • funding (6)
  • gardening (6)
  • healthcare (6)
  • hiring (6)
  • jobs (6)
  • mammals (6)
  • physics (6)
  • plants (6)
  • questions (6)
  • speculations (6)
  • students (6)
  • Conservation (5)
  • Europe (5)
  • agriculture (5)
  • ecological illiteracy (5)
  • meetings (5)
  • oceanography (5)
  • phylogenetics (5)
  • sci-fi (5)
  • Grandmother Hypothesis (4)
  • advice (4)
  • amphibians (4)
  • art (4)
  • babies (4)
  • cosmology (4)
  • essays (4)
  • fungi (4)
  • linguistics (4)
  • math (4)
  • mortality (4)
  • musings (4)
  • names (4)
  • predation (4)
  • scientific culture (4)
  • spring (4)
  • travel (4)
  • weirdness (4)
  • zoos (4)
  • Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (3)
  • Papua New Guinea (3)
  • Vertebrates (3)
  • advertising (3)
  • alternative power (3)
  • anatomy (3)
  • blatantly obvious (3)
  • chemistry (3)
  • chocolate (3)
  • citizen science (3)
  • computers (3)
  • data analysis (3)
  • denialism (3)
  • development (3)
  • earthquakes (3)
  • electricity (3)
  • energy (3)
  • ethics (3)
  • exinction (3)
  • fire (3)
  • fish (3)
  • holidays (3)
  • invertebrates (3)
  • laboratory work (3)
  • literature (3)
  • marine vertebrates (3)
  • megafauna (3)
  • methods (3)
  • pharmaceuticals (3)
  • post-reproduction (3)
  • quantitative genetics (3)
  • recruiting (3)
  • sociology (3)
  • Bow Hunter's Syndrome (2)
  • Florida (2)
  • NIH (2)
  • R (2)
  • Vermont (2)
  • academia (2)
  • activism (2)
  • anthropology (2)
  • arithmetic (2)
  • astronomy (2)
  • bats (2)
  • bioengineer (2)
  • biogeography (2)
  • biomechanics (2)
  • books (2)
  • bureaucracy (2)
  • camels (2)
  • carrion (2)
  • challenges (2)
  • condors (2)
  • constraints (2)
  • copy editing (2)
  • crustaceans (2)
  • etymology (2)
  • field course (2)
  • fraud (2)
  • idiots (2)
  • infant mortality (2)
  • jellyfish (2)
  • labor studies (2)
  • lead (2)
  • liberal arts (2)
  • medicine (2)
  • memory (2)
  • meteorology (2)
  • migration (2)
  • nonsense (2)
  • nutrition (2)
  • ontogenesis (2)
  • parenting (2)
  • phylosophy (2)
  • physiology (2)
  • popular culture (2)
  • predictions (2)
  • productivity (2)
  • rats (2)
  • ravens (2)
  • religion (2)
  • science poetry (2)
  • seasons (2)
  • sleep (2)
  • sleep deprivation (2)
  • socks (2)
  • software (2)
  • space (2)
  • tardigrades (2)
  • taxonomy (2)
  • videos (2)
  • volcano (2)
  • website (2)
  • wind (2)
  • winter (2)
  • xenobiology (2)
  • zebra (2)
  • Asimov (1)
  • BS (1)
  • Bennington College (1)
  • DAAD (1)
  • DDT (1)
  • DailyKos (1)
  • Europa (1)
  • GMO (1)
  • Gilbert and Sullivan (1)
  • HEM (1)
  • Halloween (1)
  • Hamilton (1)
  • Hubble (1)
  • Hurricanes (1)
  • Italy (1)
  • Jupiter (1)
  • Legos (1)
  • Levitis (1)
  • Levitis Syndrome (1)
  • NPR (1)
  • NSF (1)
  • Niger (1)
  • Photoshop (1)
  • SAD (1)
  • Sociality (1)
  • Stephen (1)
  • Switzerland (1)
  • Winston Churchill (1)
  • Yellowstone (1)
  • accidents (1)
  • advising (1)
  • aliens (1)
  • alligator (1)
  • alliteation (1)
  • allocare (1)
  • aphids (1)
  • bacteria (1)
  • bdelloid (1)
  • bioinformatics (1)
  • bison (1)
  • caffeine (1)
  • cannabalism (1)
  • catnip (1)
  • causality (1)
  • cetaceans (1)
  • chemosynthesis (1)
  • children (1)
  • cnidaria (1)
  • complaining (1)
  • convergent evolution (1)
  • crafts (1)
  • creationism (1)
  • creativity (1)
  • critters (1)
  • crocodilians (1)
  • crypsis (1)
  • discoveries (1)
  • dissertation defense (1)
  • dogs (1)
  • dreams (1)
  • drugs (1)
  • echinoderms (1)
  • ecotoxocology (1)
  • entomology (1)
  • epistemology (1)
  • equids (1)
  • eusociality (1)
  • exercise (1)
  • expats (1)
  • experimentation (1)
  • experts (1)
  • fallacies (1)
  • feces (1)
  • fertility (1)
  • fiction (1)
  • figures (1)
  • fluids (1)
  • folk (1)
  • for-profit publishing (1)
  • forbidden fruit (1)
  • frigorific (1)
  • gadgets (1)
  • gender (1)
  • geography (1)
  • geology (1)
  • gophers (1)
  • graphical display (1)
  • hair (1)
  • hedgehog (1)
  • history of science (1)
  • home (1)
  • humur (1)
  • immunology (1)
  • impact-factors (1)
  • incomplete dominance (1)
  • individuality (1)
  • invasive species (1)
  • inventions (1)
  • jargon (1)
  • kin selection (1)
  • law (1)
  • levels of organization (1)
  • lichens (1)
  • life (1)
  • light (1)
  • logic (1)
  • mark-recapture (1)
  • measurements (1)
  • meiosis (1)
  • mental health (1)
  • milk (1)
  • modeling (1)
  • movies (1)
  • museums (1)
  • mutation (1)
  • myths (1)
  • neurology (1)
  • nuts (1)
  • octipuses (1)
  • optimization (1)
  • organisms (1)
  • parasites (1)
  • perspective (1)
  • pests (1)
  • philoshophy (1)
  • placebo effect (1)
  • plagiarism (1)
  • plasma physics (1)
  • plastic (1)
  • poems (1)
  • pollution (1)
  • poodles (1)
  • presents (1)
  • profanity (1)
  • programing (1)
  • public health (1)
  • puns (1)
  • puzzles (1)
  • quotes (1)
  • rabbits (1)
  • references (1)
  • resource allocation (1)
  • robots (1)
  • scams (1)
  • scrounging (1)
  • shaggy dog stories (1)
  • slugs (1)
  • snakes (1)
  • speculaitons (1)
  • spiders (1)
  • sponges (1)
  • statistics (1)
  • student research (1)
  • teaching. (1)
  • telomeres (1)
  • the big obvious (1)
  • thermodynamics (1)
  • thinking (1)
  • third world (1)
  • tigers (1)
  • toddlers (1)
  • tradition (1)
  • transcriptomics (1)
  • trees (1)
  • unintended consequences (1)
  • units (1)
  • urban planning (1)
  • veligers (1)
  • venom (1)
  • yikes (1)
  • zoology (1)

Sources of the science news you won't find here

  • NYTimes Science section
  • BBC Science News
  • New Scientist
  • Science News
 

NASA Image of the Day

Loading...

QED