(n) the messy process by which basically irrational hyper-cephalic primates attempt to ask and answer questions about the world in a way that overcomes their own biases and foibles and simultaneously make a living, build a reputation and do the other things highly social primates need to do.
It (the Wikipedia article) is effectively a philosophical article. Philosophers started contesting the neutrality of a few articles, and of course now everything is contested!
Blog of science isn't one of those science blogs about cool scientific results. It's about the experience of being a scientist doing science. It's about science the process, not science the outcome, or science the list of facts.
2 comments:
The "neutrality" of the slippery slope article is disputed? How can one be neutral on a slippery slope?
It (the Wikipedia article) is effectively a philosophical article. Philosophers started contesting the neutrality of a few articles, and of course now everything is contested!
Post a Comment