My doctor looked like I had just puked in his shoes,
but eventually took the papers I was holding out to him. This was a better
response than I had expected, but still I could tell he would not look at them.
I switched doctors, and with the next one emailed him the papers after our
appointment. He wrote the referral I needed but declined to see me for months
thereafter, going so far as to change an in-person appointment for a possible
broken wrist to a phone appointment, after I was already in his parking lot.
The only thing a doctor likes less than a patient walking in
with an obscure self-diagnosis they found on the internet is when the patient
brings the medical literature about that diagnosis for the doctor to read. I
knew this, but also that my doctors had not heard of Rotational Vertebral Artery Compression Syndrome, and that I needed treatment for it. Adding insult to
injury, my obscure self-diagnosis would eventually be unquestionably confirmed
and successfully treated.
This same condition goes by multiple names in the medical literature
including Rotational Vertebral Artery Compression Syndrome, Positional VertebrobasilarIschemia, Positional Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency, and Bow Hunter's Syndrome.
This last name is the least descriptive, but also the shortest and least
jargony, so I tend to use it.
Bow Hunter's Syndrome is quite rarely diagnosed. There are
perhaps a few hundred cases documented in the medical literature, total,
globally. This could mean that it is a rarely occurring condition, but given
the lengths I had to go to get it diagnosed, the severity of those cases that
are documented, and the peculiar circumstances that allowed me to reach
diagnosis, I suspect rather that it is an only slight uncommon condition which
generally goes undiagnosed. As a neurological condition not caused by any neurological
defect, Bow Hunter's Syndrome tends to fall through the cracks.
I was able to diagnose my own case because I have a Ph.D. in
biology, loquacious physicians as parents, and extensive experience finding obscure scientific literature outside my field of expertise. I knew I had
something, as most patients do, but I also knew how to search the scientific
literature for conditions associated with terms like "cervical vertigo,"
"rotational stenosis," "positional tinnitus," and "nystagmus," then skim through the results, read those
papers that seemed most relevant, follow citations back and forth, improve my search terms, and so on to a
diagnosis. What I had to figure out was how to then navigate Earth's most wasteful medical system (USA! USA!) to arrive at an official diagnosis and ultimately treatment,
and I had to do all of this while suffering the symptoms of Bow Hunter's
Syndrome (including vertigo, ringing in my ears, dizziness, intermittently blurred
vision, and faintness).
The good news is that I am largely recovered from it, and
from the surgery that resolved it.
The bad news is that I will be posting here a series of short
essays with the hope of making this process slightly easier for other sufferers
of Bow Hunter's Syndrome, a purpose which I do hereby gleefully acknowledge
will horrify all medical professionals that happen upon this. There are, so far
as I can tell, no popular accounts, no support groups, no blog posts written
for the uninitiated, describing what Bow Hunter's Syndrome is, what it feels
like, how to approach being a patient with it. Perhaps soon more patients will
be wobbling into their doctors' offices mumbling about the blood supply to their
brain stem and a condition the doctor has never heard of. One can hope.
Next: Bow Hunter's Syndrome Part 2: What, with a dab of why
Next: Bow Hunter's Syndrome Part 2: What, with a dab of why
Then: Bow Hunter's Syndrome Part 3: Wresting diagnosis and treatment from the jaws of modern medicine
2 comments:
Sounds like you could have saved yourself a lot of trouble by just giving up bow hunting.
Remarkable! I am looking forward to more installments of this series of articles. GML
Post a Comment